This article is part of the network’s archive of useful research information. This article is closed to new comments due to inactivity. We welcome new content which can be done by submitting an article for review or take part in discussions in an open topic or submit a blog post to take your discussions online.

The authors aimed to assist in setting a baseline against which to assess progress towards the achievement of the World Health Assembly targets for reductions in low birth weight (LBW) prevalence. The authors collated data on 1447 country-years of birthweight data (281 million births) for 148 countries of 195 UN member states (47 countries had no data meeting inclusion criteria). The estimated worldwide LBW prevalence in 2015 was 14·6% compared with 17·5% in 2000 (average annual reduction rate 1·23%). In 2015, an estimated 20·5 million livebirths were LBW, 91% from low-and-middle income countries, mainly southern Asia (48%) and sub-Saharan Africa (24%).

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(18)30565-5/fulltext?utm_source=MHTF+Subscribers&utm_campaign=eb78e60b97-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_07_27_03_30_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8ac9c53ad4-eb78e60b97-183804741

References

  1. Hughes MM Black RE Katz J. 2500-g low birth weight cutoff: history and implications for future research and policy.
    Matern Child Health J. 2017; 21: 283-289

  2. Lawn JE Blencowe H Oza S et al. Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014; 384: 189-205

  3. Accrombessi M Zeitlin J Massougbodji A Cot M Briand V. What do we know about risk factors for fetal growth restriction in Africa at the time of sustainable development goals? A scoping review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018; 32: 184-196